|
Cobourg Atheist - News and Resources from Canada
|
Written by John Draper
|
|
Saturday, 14 August 2010 07:29 |
|
A French Christian came close to giving up his faith when he experienced the American version. His main problem is how religion and politics are mixed together in the U.S. In Europe, Australia and Canada, it does not matter what politicians think - unless they are evangelical and want to impose their beliefs on the country (like Stockwell Day). Only the U.S. has "separation of Church and State" in their constitution yet they are the only western country where that is not true. Because of this convergence, the Christian lobby has enormous power - worse, it's the evangelical, fundamentalist viewpoint that gets pushed.
The French Christian simply could not understand how the American Church had taken something so deeply personal and introspective, and turned it into a daily public spectacle. The desire for personal piety had been transformed into a need to impose and ensure the piety of others, whether they believed it or not.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Written by Bill Broderick
|
|
Friday, 13 August 2010 07:03 |
|
The news that the world is going to end on December 21, 2012, may possibly come as a shock to some people. For most of us, I suspect, it's ho-hum time again. I mean, the world has ended so many times since people began keeping records, with no obvious or any other consequence that anyone has ever discerned, that sensible people don't take the impending doomsday scenarios seriously anymore.
Think about it: If the world ended in 1914, to take one well-publicized year, why is the world still here? Another widely publicized world-ending year was 1925. When the expected end did not arrive, attendance at the annual "Memorial Service" of one well-known religious sect that had been prominent in spreading the prediction, fell from over 90,000 to about 17,0000.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Written by John Draper
|
|
Thursday, 12 August 2010 07:13 |
|
Christians and Muslims believe that prayer works - at least that's what they say. Why would someone believe that thinking thoughts would make something happen or become true. It's a seductive thought - it would be wonderful if it were true. But then the bible says it's true: In Mark 11:24, Jesus says: "Therefore I tell you, whatever you ask for in prayer, believe that you have received it, and it will be yours." Seems quite unambiguous. No qualifiers about "only sometimes, god does not want to force you to believe and take away your free will". No mention of such stuff. Maybe you need a group of people praying. In Matthew 18:19 Jesus says: "Again I say to you, if two of you agree on earth about anything they ask, it will be done for them by my Father in heaven. For where two or three are gathered in my name, there am I in the midst of them."
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by John Draper
|
|
Wednesday, 11 August 2010 07:22 |
|
In an interview with Steve Paikin from TVO, Lionel Tiger described the brain as a natural product of evolution and to ensure its survival, the brain then invented religion. Since something like 90% of the world’s population believe in one of the 200 odd religions, believing in a religion is a “natural” phenomenon. Tiger then goes on to say, that unlike Richard Dawkin’s position, he thinks that if it’s natural it must be good – having a religion does not make us foolish and wrong. Since religion is a creation of the brain, it obviously plays an important part in survival. He says it soothes us, re-assures us and makes us feel good – especially in hard times. If we have “brain-pain” (e.g. worries), religions will soothe and help us.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Written by John Draper
|
|
Tuesday, 10 August 2010 07:16 |
|
There is a built-in need for us to want a religion. Dan Dennett talks about the "belief in belief"; others talk about the evolution of religion; many Christians talk about the good feeling that religion gives them - they feel better in some way because they have "faith". Religion is clearly an emotional thing - it fills a need that many people have. But religion is demonstrably bad - see any book on atheism and most articles on this site. So if religion must be replaced - and it eventually will for most people - then what will fill that need?
If we take the definition of religion developed in a recent court case (article here), we have the following:
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by John Draper
|
|
Monday, 09 August 2010 07:25 |
|
Morality has changed over the centuries - in civilized countries, slavery is no longer acceptable, women have equal rights, birth control is expected, war is not glorified and many minor taboos have gone. So it is clear that if a higher power mandated morality, it is not fixed and not absolute. The average person gets their set of moral standards from their parents and to some extent from society's teachers such as high priests or their modern equivalent but where do they get their rules from? The short answer is that morality is handed down from earlier generations and is also virtually self-evident. It is clear that a society cannot function if indiscriminate killing or stealing is allowed. Society needs trust and that means lying must be unethical or at least minimized. So there is no need to have an external god, or a representative of such an entity, tell the rest of us what the rules are.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Written by Bill Broderick
|
|
Sunday, 08 August 2010 07:25 |
|
According to the latest Pew Forum on Scientific Literacy, only about 10 percent of Americans (and presumably Canadians) are scientifically informed. The forum posed 12 questions, some of which might be considered general knowledge, and others specifically scientific. Among the general knowledge ones was "Which over-the-counter drug do doctors recommend that people take to prevent heart attacks?" and "Which gas do most scientists believe causes temperatures in the atmosphere to rise?" The answer to the first was aspirin (1.5 percent got it right); to the second, carbon dioxide (a whopping eight percent answered correctly).
Among the more scientific questions was "How are stem cells different from other cells?" The answer is that they can develop into many different kinds of cells. Another was a statement to be answered true or false: "Electrons are smaller than atoms." True, of course.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 4 of 74 |
Copyright © 2010 Cobourg Atheist. All Rights Reserved.
|
|
News Update
Sept 4, 2010
1. Hindus are being asked to join a massive demonstration planned on Sept 11 at ground zero against the mosque planned to be built there. Hindus have suffered at the hands of Islam over many years and now want to speak out. More.
2. An Anglican Church in Ottawa scheduled showing the movie Collision featuring Christopher Hitchens and Douglas Wilson. But to keep it on neutral ground, they booked a pub, the Heart and Crown, to show it. When the pub owner saw the advertising material for the movie, he cancelled the reservation - because it might offend religious pub-goers. The pub bills itself as an "Irish Catholic Institution"! The movie screening was moved to the Church. National Post.
Quote of the Day
A quote from Catch-22 by Joesph Heller - from the web site Unreasonable Faith "And don't tell me God works in mysterious ways,"..... Why in the world did He ever create pain?... What a colossal, immortal blunderer!... His sheer incompetence is almost staggering" and lots more - here. Priceless! |
A Recent Poll
Attitudes to Religions - Time
Aug 19, 2010
Americans unfavourable towards:
| Muslims |
43% |
| Mormons |
29% |
| Catholics |
17% |
| Jews |
13% |
| Protestants |
13% |
Support "gound zero" mosque?
Who's Online
We have 42 guests online
Site Statistics
|
Members is count of authors
Content is count of articles
Web links counts the Blogroll
Content view hits is count of views of articles since May 17 2009. This is about 2.6 times count of visitors.
|
Members : 16
Content : 739
Web Links : 56
Content View Hits : 257172
|