Catholic Contradictions
- Details
- Created on Friday, 17 May 2013 06:43
- Published on Friday, 17 May 2013 06:43
- Written by John Draper
- Hits: 77
One difference between Catholic teaching and other religions is that Catholics reject "relativism" - Benedict was the most recent Pope to speak out against it. In its place, Catholics promote the idea that morality is objective. Any particular act is always wrong. Jesuit Kenneth Baker writes that "The Catholic Church has consistently and continually rejected subjectivism and relativism in morality". This is why they resist approval of abortion and gay sex. They also say that abusing children is wrong whether it's done by priests or anyone. So that would mean that abuse is always wrong and is never acceptable no matter the circumstances.
Read more: Catholic Contradictions
Astrology or Star Struck
- Details
- Created on Wednesday, 15 May 2013 06:50
- Published on Wednesday, 15 May 2013 06:50
- Written by John Draper
- Hits: 2868
By Karl S. Kruszelnicki
The word "disaster" comes from Latin words meaning "bad star" - which shows that the Romans thought that the stars could influence our lives. They were wrong, but even today, many people share this belief.
There are several types of astrology. "General Astrology" looks at how humanity is affected by supposedly "significant" alignments of the stars and planet. "Genethlialogy" is a branch that looks at your life based on the positions of the stars and planets at the moment of your birth, while "Catarchic Astrology" tries to find the most auspicious time to start a given task.
Religion and Canadian Politics
- Details
- Created on Monday, 13 May 2013 07:17
- Published on Monday, 13 May 2013 07:17
- Written by John Draper
- Hits: 124
At the 2011 Federal election, an Ipsos Reid exit poll showed that in Canada, support of Political parties is divided along religious lines. Personally, I believe we live in, or should be living in, a secular society so that politics is to do with economics and preserving equal rights. From this flows the concept of supporting the disadvantaged while maintaining an incentive to work. If there is no incentive to work, the contribution to society is unequal. But it seems that not everyone agrees with my views. Many people colour their view of politics by their religious views although it’s not easy to see the connection.
But first, let’s look at the numbers. A simple measure of religiosity is weekly attendance at a Church:
"Believers" Don't Believe in God
- Details
- Created on Saturday, 11 May 2013 07:08
- Published on Saturday, 11 May 2013 07:08
- Written by Larry R. Lawson
- Hits: 3305
Reading, in recent weeks, some very interesting blogs on atheist sites and the comments that get written on these blogs, one thing has gradually been borne in upon me. Odd as it may seem, I'm becoming convinced that those who claim to be religious "believers", do not, in fact believe what they say they believe. They do not believe in a god.
Many of them show little or no signs of having any clear idea just what it is they do believe; each indicating a different, sometimes much different, concept of a "god". Since their idea of what and who their god is, is the basis for their other ideas about religion and faith, it is not at all surprising that those other ideas will also show a marked difference from person to person and from church to church when their very concept of god is different.
Official 2011 Census Canada results on Religion
- Details
- Created on Thursday, 09 May 2013 06:44
- Published on Thursday, 09 May 2013 06:44
- Written by John Draper
- Hits: 139
It takes a while but Census Canada have now released some numbers on religions in Canada. They have wrapped the numbers together with immigration numbers but the trend is clear. Religion in Canada is dying out - especially the Christian religion. From 2006 to 2011, Christians dropped from 75% of the population to 67% and "No religion" increased from 17.5% to 23.6%. Because of the way the question was asked, few responded as atheist, agnostic or humanist even though other polls and surveys show that close to 5% would say they are not only "no religion" but do not believe in even a higher power. The census was flawed from the start - in 2006, completion of the long form questionnaire was compulsory but in 2011 it was not. This happened because of political interference and resulted in the resignation of some senior census managers. In addition the question on religion focused on culture and not what people practised. (Cobourg atheist article)
The Evolution of Jesus and the New Testament
- Details
- Created on Sunday, 05 May 2013 06:38
- Published on Sunday, 05 May 2013 06:38
- Written by John Draper
- Hits: 192
The story of Jesus 2000 years ago is accepted by Christians as factual - but it's more likely he's a legend. That is, someone who existed but whose life is not like the stories we are told. Just consider the evolution of the documents that are supposed to tell his story. The first books written (in the New Testament) were by Paul - a chronology is here. Although his first letter to the Thessalonians was written over 20 years after the death of Jesus in 52 AD, you'd expect him to document the relatively recent amazing events of the miracles of Jesus, his resurrection and his virgin mother. But no, all his letters talk about are the teachings of Jesus and the vague statement that he was the "son of God". He does mention that he "died for us" and performed "miracles and wonders and signs" (Acts 2.22 - written no earlier than ~AD 60) but gave no details.
The Unbelievers - Lawrence Krauss and Richard Dawkins
- Details
- Created on Tuesday, 07 May 2013 06:32
- Published on Tuesday, 07 May 2013 06:32
- Written by John Draper
- Hits: 154
Back in February, I publicised the new documentary by Lawrence Krauss and Richard Dawkins called The Unbelievers but I was not impressed by the trailer. There is more at the official movie web site here and that seems to do a better job of promoting the film. I agree with most of what's said in the movie but as a fan of film, it's hard for me to see it as a "must see" movie. I like Lawrence Krauss - he's smart, informative and entertaining. Richard Dawkins is unfortunately past his prime - he's occasionally brilliant but often dull. If I hear him say one more time how he is in awe when he looks at the stars, I'll scream. But the occasion of the premier of the movie in Toronto at the "Hot-docs" festival meant they were on multiple TV shows for interview and although the interviewers seemed to think the subject was interesting and controversial, their interviews were mostly dull.
Read more: The Unbelievers - Lawrence Krauss and Richard Dawkins
The real story of Jesus
- Details
- Created on Friday, 03 May 2013 06:43
- Published on Friday, 03 May 2013 06:43
- Written by John Draper
- Hits: 3615
If you want to know what the person called Jesus in the Bible was really like and what he really did, you have to do a lot of study of ancient history. It helps to study things like the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Gnostic texts and one person who did that was William Hopper.
He liked to write in a light tone so that his books would have popular appeal - hence the title of his book "The Heathen's Guide to World Religions". It got to a 6th edition in 2003 - and a 7th electronic edition has since been published (his site here). Hopper quotes his sources so it's not just light entertainment and I highly recommend it. His book is the source of the facts in this article.
